Requires voter approval before local governing authorities may impose civil fines for traffic violations captured by automatic traffic enforcement systems. (1/1/13)
Impact
The implementation of SB85 would have a significant influence on state laws pertaining to traffic enforcement, specifically addressing the intersection of technology and local governance. By requiring voter approval for civil fines imposed via automated systems, the bill seeks to prevent local authorities from implementing such measures without community consent. This could lead to a decrease in the number of traffic violations processed through automated systems, potentially resulting in lower revenue from these fines for local governments, but with the benefit of increased public input on these practices.
Summary
Senate Bill 85 requires that local governing authorities in Louisiana seek voter approval before imposing civil fines for traffic violations that are captured by automated traffic enforcement systems. This bill aims to enhance transparency and local control over such fines, ensuring that the community has a say in whether such enforcement practices should be implemented. The requirement is set to take effect on January 1, 2013, emphasizing the need for a democratic process in matters that can significantly impact local residents.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SB85 appears to be largely positive among those advocating for local control and transparency in governance. Supporters argue that the bill upholds democratic values by allowing citizens to directly influence laws that affect them. However, there may be contention from law enforcement and local officials who see the bill as a hindrance to effective traffic regulation and enforcement, potentially reducing safety measures on the roads.
Contention
Notable points of contention surrounding SB85 include concerns over the balance between effective traffic enforcement and preserving local governance. Opponents may argue that requiring voter approval could slow down the implementation of necessary traffic safety measures. Additionally, there could be a debate on whether local governments should defer to the will of the electorate for such operational decisions, which may be seen as bureaucratic or inefficient by some stakeholders.
Requires voter approval before local governing authorities may impose civil fines for traffic violations captured by automated traffic enforcement systems
Requires voter approval before local governing authorities may impose civil fines for traffic violations captured by automated traffic enforcement systems (OR DECREASE LF RV See Note)
Requires voter approval prior to the imposition of civil fines for traffic violations based on evidence captured by automated traffic enforcement systems
Requires voter approval prior to the imposition of civil fines for traffic violations based on evidence captured by automated traffic enforcement systems (OR DECREASE LF RV See Note)
Requires voter approval prior to the imposition of civil fines for traffic violations based on evidence captured by automated traffic enforcement systems (OR DECREASE LF RV See Note)
Prohibits governing authorities from imposing civil fines for traffic violations enforced by automated traffic enforcement systems without a vote of the people
Relating to the authority of the governing body of a local authority to impose a civil penalty for certain violations recorded by an automated traffic control system or a photographic traffic signal enforcement system; providing a civil penalty.
Relating to the authority of the governing body of a local authority to impose a civil penalty for certain violations recorded by an automated traffic control system or a photographic traffic signal enforcement system.
Relating to the authority of the governing body of a local authority to impose a civil penalty for certain violations recorded by an automated traffic control system or a photographic traffic signal enforcement system.