Louisiana House Bill HB213

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the DOTD in the matter of "Shirley Fields v. City of Baton Rouge, State of Louisiana"

Impact

The passage of HB 213 allows the DOTD to settle this specific legal issue efficiently and prevents the potential for further legal complications or penalties that could arise from failing to pay the judgment. By appropriating funds to resolve this matter, the state demonstrates a commitment to uphold judicial decisions and manage disputes involving state entities responsibly. The processing of such judgments through state appropriations reflects the ongoing need for transparency in financial management of public funds.

Summary

House Bill 213 is an appropriations bill concerning the payment of a consent judgment against the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) stemming from a legal case entitled 'Shirley Fields v. City of Baton Rouge.' The bill allocates $8,900 from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2012-2013 to cover this judgment. It outlines the financial implications for the state and ensures that the Department can fulfill its legal obligations regarding the judgment from the Nineteenth Judicial District Court.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 213 appears to be largely neutral, focusing on the necessity of fulfilling judicial obligations rather than igniting significant political debate. The appropriation of funds for legal judgments often attracts less controversy than bills involving policy changes or significant fiscal impacts, indicating a consensus on the importance of accountability in the governmental process. Discussions surrounding the bill did not indicate any notable opposition or support from community members or legislators beyond logistical considerations.

Contention

Since the bill focuses solely on funding a negligence case without introducing new policies or altering existing state law, there are few contentious points arising from its passage. Most concerns would stem from the overall impact of state financial management and budgeting rather than the specifics of the bill itself. However, it is essential to note that consistent appropriations could prompt discussions about the state’s spending priorities, especially regarding its commitments to infrastructure and other public services which are affected by DOTD's budget.