Louisiana House Bill HB184

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against DOTD in the matter of "Carl Fruge and Darla Fruge v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, et al"

Impact

The passage of HB 184 ensures that the DOTD meets its financial obligations resulting from a court ruling, which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of state operations. By appropriating these funds, the state acknowledges its responsibility to uphold judicial decisions and manage its fiscal commitments. The allocation responds directly to the needs arising from legal disputes involving the DOTD, underscoring the importance of proper funding in resolving such matters.

Summary

House Bill 184 is an appropriation measure aimed at paying a consent judgment against the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD). The bill allocates a total of $867,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2012-2013. This payment is specifically designated for satisfying the judgment in the case 'Carl Fruge and Darla Fruge v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, et al', which was filed in the Tenth Judicial District Court of Natchitoches Parish. The effective date for this appropriation is set for July 1, 2012.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 184 appears to be predominantly neutral, focusing on the necessity of fulfilling a legal obligation rather than reflecting strong political divides or contention. Lawmakers' discussions around appropriations such as HB 184 typically emphasize responsibility and compliance with judicial outcomes, rather than the merits of the case itself. This general disposition suggests that most legislators recognize the importance of the matter at hand and the need for fiscal responsibility.

Contention

While no major points of contention were noted regarding HB 184, appropriations bills often provoke discussions about budget limits and priorities. Legislators might express concerns about the impact of this expenditure on the overall state budget and how it might affect funding for other public services. Therefore, while HB 184 may not face significant opposition in terms of its content, it could still be subject to debate regarding fiscal responsibility and funding allocations in the wider context of state financial management.