Louisiana House Bill HB217

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 4/2/12
• Engrossed: 4/9/12
• Refer: 4/10/12
• Report Pass: 4/23/12
• Enrolled: 5/2/12
• Chaptered: 5/11/12
• Passed: 5/11/12

Caption

Provides relative to per diem paid to members of the governing board of the Tangipahoa Parish Sewerage District No. 1 (EN +$16,200 LF EX See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 217 will directly affect the fiscal management of Tangipahoa Parish's sewerage district by allowing for greater monetary incentives for board members. It potentially increases the annual budget for board member compensation, estimated at an additional $16,200 per year. This fiscal shift may encourage more community members to assume board positions, thereby increasing local involvement and oversight in sewerage management. Moreover, it addresses concerns about adequate compensation, which may have been a barrier to participation in the past.

Summary

House Bill 217, passed in Louisiana, focuses on altering the compensation structure for members of the governing board of the Tangipahoa Parish Sewerage District No. 1. Specifically, the bill increases the maximum per diem payment for board members from existing limits, allowing them to receive up to $150 for each day of attendance at regular meetings, with a cap on the number of paid meetings. This change aims to provide fair compensation for members who dedicate time to managing the operations of the sewerage district, promoting active participation in local governance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 217 appears neutral to positive, especially among supporters who advocate for fair pay for civic duties. Local leaders and constituents likely appreciate the recognition of the time and effort involved in board activities, contributing to better governance. There are no noted significant oppositional sentiments or controversies in the voting record, indicating a general consensus on the necessity of the bill among legislators.

Contention

While the bill was passed without controversy, there may be underlying concerns regarding the long-term implications of increased expenditures from the district's budget. Critics of increased governmental compensation might argue that such changes should be approached with caution to avoid misallocation of funds. Nonetheless, the report from the votes shows unanimous support, suggesting that the legislators found value in the enhancements made through this bill for the governance of the sewerage district.