Requires BESE to develop and implement a school accountability system for approved nonpublic schools
Impact
The implications of HB 351 are significant as it establishes a framework for assessing nonpublic schools, thereby raising educational expectations and accountability. With this bill, nonpublic schools will have to adhere to specific standards regarding student testing, grading, and reporting, which aligns their operations more closely with that of public schools. This move seeks to ensure that public funds are allocated to schools that meet recognized educational metrics, thus enhancing the quality of education across the state.
Summary
House Bill 351 mandates the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE) to create and implement an accountability system specifically for approved nonpublic schools receiving public funding, with the system becoming effective for the 2012-2013 school year. This initiative aims to ensure that there is a standardized method of evaluation similar to that which exists for public schools, thereby ensuring greater transparency and educational quality among nonpublic institutions that benefit from state funds.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 351 appears to be supportive among advocates for education reform and accountability. Proponents argue that it ensures that all schools receiving public money are held to similar standards, fostering an equitable education system. However, there may be some opposition from nonpublic school advocates who view the increased regulation as a potential encroachment upon their autonomy and the ability to operate according to their specific educational philosophies.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise regarding the extent of BESE's oversight and the implications of having nonpublic schools adhere to public school standards. Critics may argue that the bill could impose a one-size-fits-all approach on diverse educational frameworks prevalent in nonpublic institutions. Additionally, discussions could emerge concerning the fairness of applying public school accountability measures to nonpublic schools, which traditionally operate under different governance models.
Provides relative to implementation of Common Core State Standards and the development of curriculum guides prior to such implementation for public schools and nonpublic schools participating in the voucher program
Requires the state Dept. of Education to develop an accountability system for nonpublic schools participating in the voucher program and requires compliance with the system by such schools (OR SEE FISC NOTE GF EX)
Requires the state Dept. of Education to develop an accountability system for nonpublic schools participating in the voucher program and requires compliance with the system by such schools (OR NO IMPACT See Note)
Requests that the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education study the feasibility of developing an accountability system for nonpublic schools participating in the voucher program comparable to the accountability system for public schools
Provides for implementation of state content standards and assessments subject to legislative approval and permits local school systems to develop and implement content standards in lieu of state standards
Prohibits assignment of letter grades to schools or school districts or any other implementation of the school and district accountability system for a school year in which there is a declared natural disaster