Louisiana Senate Bill SB234

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 3/27/12
• Engrossed: 4/3/12
• Refer: 4/4/12
• Report Pass: 4/30/12
• Enrolled: 5/22/12
• Chaptered: 6/1/12
• Passed: 6/1/12

Caption

Creates server permits for security personnel for purposes of the Louisiana Responsible Vendor Program. (8/1/12) (EN INCREASE SG EX See Note)

Impact

The bill's impact on state laws includes the requirement for vendors to ensure that their security personnel are properly trained and certified. It establishes a framework for server training courses, setting standards for knowledge in handling disruptive situations and ensuring the responsible selling of alcoholic beverages and tobacco products. Moreover, it creates a mitigation measure wherein vendors certified as responsible can have penalties or fines reduced for first-time offenses regarding sales to underage or intoxicated patrons.

Summary

Senate Bill 234 aims to enhance the Louisiana Responsible Vendor Program by introducing server permits for security personnel. This bill amends existing laws related to alcoholic beverages and tobacco, particularly in the areas of server and security personnel training, permit requirements, and vendor accountability. The legislation sets forth new definitions and guidelines that seek to improve the training and certification processes for personnel who monitor establishments where alcoholic beverages are served, enhancing both safety and regulatory compliance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 234 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among those advocating for responsible alcohol and tobacco sales. Proponents highlight that the bill will enhance public safety and make establishments more accountable for their staff's actions. However, there could also be concerns about the administrative burden on vendors to comply with the new training and certification requirements, and whether these measures might overstep into local governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention with SB 234 include discussions on the balance between state regulation and local control, particularly regarding exemptions from local training requirements for vendors certified under the state program. There may be implications for local ordinances and additional licensing processes that could create confusion or overlap, which opponents might argue undermines local decision-making authority over community standards.