Louisiana Senate Bill SB422

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 3/20/12
• Engrossed: 3/27/12
• Refer: 3/28/12
• Report Pass: 5/15/12
• Enrolled: 5/31/12
• Chaptered: 6/13/12
• Passed: 6/13/12

Caption

Provides relative to legislative review of emergency rules or fees. (gov sig)

Impact

The bill impacts the way the state handles emergency regulations by increasing the involvement of the legislature in the oversight of rules that agencies implement under emergency circumstances. By requiring an oversight subcommittee to review these emergency rules within a designated period, it reinforces a system of checks and balances between executive agencies and legislative bodies, ensuring that the justification for such actions is properly scrutinized.

Summary

Senate Bill 422 aims to amend the Administrative Procedure Act regarding the legislative review process of emergency rules and fees in Louisiana. The core intent of this bill is to ensure that any agency adopting an emergency rule must provide a legitimate statement of reasons to key legislative leaders within a short timeframe after the rule's adoption. This requirement sets clear expectations for transparency and accountability in situations where immediate regulatory action is deemed necessary by an agency to safeguard public welfare.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 422 seems to suggest a cautious approach towards administrative flexibility in emergency situations. Supporters likely view the bill as a means of enhancing legislative oversight and ensuring that agency actions are in the public's best interest. Conversely, there may be concerns regarding the potential for bureaucratic delay in addressing urgent matters, as additional legislative reviews may slow down the ability to implement necessary emergency regulations swiftly.

Contention

Some points of contention could arise regarding the balance of authority between administrative agencies and the legislature. While proponents argue that legislative review can prevent misuse of emergency powers, detractors may warn that the bill could hinder timely responses to emergencies. The outcome of this debate highlights the ongoing tension in governance between maintaining swift executive action in emergencies and ensuring legislative accountability.