Creates the Carmel Acres Crime Prevention and Improvement District in East Baton Rouge Parish. (8/1/12)
Impact
The bill authorizes the levy of a parcel fee of up to one hundred dollars per year on properties within the district, which will fund the additional security services and improvement initiatives. This fee can be approved by a majority of registered voters in the district and can be increased a single time without a further vote after five years. The funds collected will be managed transparently as part of the annual budget, ensuring accountability in the use of taxpayer money for local enhancements.
Summary
Senate Bill 395 creates the Carmel Acres Crime Prevention and Improvement District in East Baton Rouge Parish. This district aims to enhance crime prevention measures and improve overall security for residents by funding additional law enforcement personnel and community beautification projects. The district will be governed by a board of commissioners made up of local representatives, who will oversee its operations and fiscal responsibilities. The establishment of this district recognizes the specific needs of the Carmel Acres community in addressing crime and enhancing livability through organized efforts.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding SB 395 appears to be generally positive, especially among local residents who see the value in increased security and beautification. The bill has garnered support from community leaders and local representatives who understand the district's needs. However, there may also be some concerns regarding the additional financial burden on property owners due to the imposition of the parcel fee, depending on how it is communicated and justified.
Contention
Notable points of contention around the bill may involve the governance and decision-making authority of the district's board, including concerns about representation and the potential for conflicts of interest among appointed members. Additionally, discussions may arise regarding the effectiveness of the funds allocated for crime prevention versus beautification and whether these efforts will lead to measurable improvements in community safety. Residents may also question the necessity of the fee and advocate for more diverse funding methods.