Louisiana House Bill HB699

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12

Caption

Provides that certain electronic mail addresses obtained through certain corporate and association filings are confidential

Impact

If enacted, HB 699 will modify existing public records laws to include specific exemptions for electronic mail addresses submitted in business filings. This change will limit public access to individual email addresses, thereby reducing the risks associated with business identity theft. The practical implications of this law will likely lead to enhanced privacy for registered businesses and their representatives, protecting them from unsolicited phishing attempts and fraudulent activities.

Summary

House Bill 699, known as 'The Business Identity Theft Prevention Act', establishes the confidentiality of certain electronic mail addresses obtained through corporate and association filings with the state’s secretary of state. The bill aims to protect sensitive information, recognizing that email addresses collected during business filings are vulnerable to identity theft. By classifying these email addresses as confidential, the bill seeks to strengthen privacy protections around business entities and individuals alike.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 699 appears generally supportive, particularly among those concerned with identity theft and cybersecurity. Advocates argue that the protection of email addresses is a proactive measure to safeguard personal and corporate information in an increasingly digital landscape. However, there may also be dissenting opinions that highlight concerns regarding transparency and public access to information, suggesting that greater caution should be exercised to balance privacy with the need for accountability.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the degree of confidentiality afforded to these email addresses. While proponents of the bill argue for greater protections, some critics may argue that such measures could impede transparency in business dealings or hinder public access to essential information. The debate centers on finding the appropriate equilibrium between individual privacy rights and the public’s right to be informed about business practices, thus inviting broader discussions about the overarching principles of public records laws.