Louisiana House Bill HB781

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 5/2/12
• Engrossed: 5/9/12
• Refer: 5/10/12
• Report Pass: 5/15/12
• Enrolled: 5/30/12
• Chaptered: 6/7/12
• Passed: 6/7/12

Caption

Authorizes the use of multiple chemical tests

Impact

The implementation of HB 781 is expected to have significant implications for state laws concerning DUI enforcement. It creates stricter measures for repeat offenders who are found to be operating vehicles under the influence, thus reinforcing the consequences of refusal to submit to testing. The change seeks to discourage individuals from attempting to evade consequences associated with intoxicated driving by refusing tests. In doing so, it hopes to promote safer roadways and reduce the number of incidents involving alcohol and substance abuse while driving.

Summary

House Bill 781 amends the existing regulations regarding chemical tests for individuals suspected of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. Specifically, it allows law enforcement officers to mandate multiple chemical tests for individuals who have previously refused testing on two separate occasions. The intent is to increase accountability among repeat offenders and to enhance the tools available to law enforcement in ensuring public safety on the roads. By authorizing the administration of both breath and additional blood tests, the bill aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of a suspect's state at the time of the offense.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment among legislators concerning HB 781 appears to be supportive, particularly from those prioritizing public safety and the reduction of traffic-related offenses. Proponents of the bill argue that it provides necessary tools for law enforcement to combat drunk driving more effectively and hold dangerous repeat offenders accountable. However, there may be concerns from civil rights advocates regarding the implications of forcing individuals to submit to multiple tests, potentially raising issues about personal liberties and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 781 may arise over the potential legal and ethical implications of enforcing multiple tests on individuals. Critics might argue that the mandatory testing could infringe on individual rights and that there should be considerations and safeguards in place to protect those who might be wrongfully accused. The dialogue surrounding this bill will likely reflect a balance between enhancing public safety and safeguarding personal freedoms, making it a topic of lively debate as it moves through the legislative process.