Louisiana House Bill HB911

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/12/12
• Refer: 3/12/12
• Report Pass: 5/2/12
• Engrossed: 5/9/12
• Refer: 5/10/12
• Report Pass: 5/21/12
• Enrolled: 5/24/12
• Chaptered: 5/31/12
• Passed: 5/31/12

Caption

Provides relative to the School Choice Pilot Program for Certain Students with Exceptionalities (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)

Impact

By eliminating the time limitation on the pilot program, HB 911 allows for an extended evaluation of the program's effectiveness, potentially paving the way for statewide implementation. This change signifies a commitment to inclusivity in education for students who may require specialized instruction and support. The bill also modifies eligibility criteria, ensuring more students can benefit from the program, thereby aiming to enhance educational outcomes for those with exceptional needs.

Summary

House Bill 911 modifies the School Choice Pilot Program for Certain Students with Exceptionalities in Louisiana by removing the original two-year limit on the program. The bill aims to provide students with specific exceptionalities the opportunity to select schools that offer tailored educational services, which is seen as essential for addressing the unique needs of these students. The program targets students with various disabilities, indicating an intention to improve access to appropriate education for vulnerable populations.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 911 appears to be supportive, especially among advocates for special education. Proponents praise the bill for extending opportunities for students who might struggle in traditional public school settings. However, there may be concerns regarding the adequacy of resources and training for teachers in nonpublic schools participating in the program, suggesting that while the intent is positive, the execution may face challenges.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the potential for nonpublic schools to adequately cater to the needs of students with exceptionalities. Critics may argue that without stringent oversight, there's a risk that these institutions may not provide sufficient educational support, which could undermine the purpose of HB 911. The discussions may also revolve around the implications of diverting funds from public schools to nonpublic institutions, raising debates about funding equity and the effectiveness of educational regulations.