Louisiana Senate Bill SCR20

Louisiana 2011 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 4/11/11
• Passed: 4/11/11
• Engrossed: 4/12/11

Caption

Commends Joanne Michiels for her 28 years of service at the VA Medical Center.

Impact

The adoption of SCR20 does not enact new laws or amend existing statutes but rather serves as a symbolic recognition of an individual's long service. Such resolutions can enhance community morale by acknowledging the contributions of dedicated professionals like Michiels, particularly in the field of veterans' healthcare. This act of commendation exemplifies the state's appreciation for the commitment shown by individuals in service-oriented roles and can inspire others in similar positions.

Summary

Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 20 (SCR20) is a resolution that commends Joanne Michiels for her remarkable twenty-eight years of service at the Veterans Administration Medical Center. The resolution highlights Michiels' dedication to her role and acknowledges her contributions since she began working in 1970, as well as her commitment to family, having paused her career to raise her children before returning to the VA in 1986. The resolution serves to formally recognize her impact on the community and the significance of her work in veterans' healthcare.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around SCR20 is positive, with unanimous support evident in the voting history, where the resolution was adopted with zero opposition votes. This reflects a shared acknowledgment by the legislators of the importance of recognizing those who have dedicated their lives to serving veterans and their families. The dialogue surrounding the resolution would likely also emphasize the integral role of individuals like Michiels in strengthening the support systems available for veterans.

Contention

While SCR20 appears to resonate positively with the legislative body and the community, it may also reflect broader discussions about the necessary support and recognition available for veterans' services. Such resolutions can lead to discussions about resource allocation and the recognition of various individuals in different capacities, potentially raising questions about how the state prioritizes veteran care and the professionals dedicated to that field. However, there are no notable points of contention directly associated with this resolution.