Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00959

Introduced
2/21/13  
Refer
2/21/13  
Report Pass
3/7/13  
Report Pass
3/7/13  
Refer
3/18/13  
Refer
3/18/13  
Report Pass
3/25/13  
Report Pass
3/25/13  
Engrossed
5/15/13  
Engrossed
5/15/13  
Report Pass
5/17/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Grace Period For Life Insurance Policies And Designation Of Third Parties To Receive Cancellation Notices.

Impact

The bill alters existing state statutes regarding grace periods for insurance policies, thus formalizing protections for consumers that may have inadvertently fallen behind on premium payments. Additionally, it introduces a requirement for insurers to provide policyholders with the option to designate a third party to receive notice of policy cancellations due to nonpayment. This is aimed at ensuring that policyholders have someone else informed of potential lapses in coverage, which could be particularly beneficial for vulnerable populations such as the elderly or those with disabilities.

Summary

SB00959, titled 'An Act Concerning the Grace Period for Life Insurance Policies and Designation of Third Parties to Receive Cancellation Notices', focuses on enhancing consumer protections for life insurance policyholders in Connecticut. Specifically, it mandates that any life insurance policy or annuity contract issued after October 1, 2013, must include a grace period of at least sixty days for overdue premium payments. During this grace period, if a claim arises, the amount due can be deducted from the settlement, ensuring that policyholders are not immediately penalized for late payments.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB00959 appears to be generally supportive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and legislators focused on consumer rights. They argue that the bill provides vital protections to policyholders, allowing them to maintain coverage during unforeseen financial difficulties. However, there are concerns among some industry representatives about the practicality of implementing these changes, particularly regarding the administrative burdens on insurance companies to comply with the new notification requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB00959 involve the balance between consumer protections and insurance company operational concerns. Critics within the insurance industry express worries that the extended grace period and third-party notification requirements might expose insurers to increased risks and complications in claim processing. Moreover, discussions have pointed out the potential for administrative overload, raising questions about how effectively these requirements can be integrated into existing insurance operations without significant disruptions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05503

An Act Concerning Insurance Market Conduct And Insurance Licensing, The Insurance Department's Technical Corrections And Other Revisions To The Insurance Statutes And Captive Insurance.

CT SB00398

An Act Concerning The Regulation And Taxation Of Travel Insurance And Associated Entities, Products And Professionals.

CT SB00400

An Act Concerning The Insurance Department's Technical Corrections And Other Revisions To The Insurance Statutes.

CT HB05250

An Act Concerning Self-service Storage Insurance.

CT SB00404

An Act Concerning Affordability As A Factor In Premium Rate Filings For Individual And Group Health Insurance Policies.

CT SB00403

An Act Concerning Insurance Market Conduct And Insurance Licensing.

CT SB00395

An Act Concerning The Reporting Of Medical Debt.

CT SB00435

An Act Concerning The Designation Of Farm Land And Open Space Land And Revisions To The Connecticut Entity Transactions Act.

CT SB00372

An Act Concerning A Working Group To Study Payments By Insurance Companies For Deposit Into The Insurance Fund.

CT SB00008

An Act Concerning Drug Affordability.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.