Arkansas Senate Bill SB39

Arkansas 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/24
• Refer: 4/10/24
• Report Pass: 4/16/24
• Engrossed: 4/17/24
• Enrolled: 4/18/24
• Chaptered: 4/23/24
• Passed: 4/23/24

Caption

An Act For The Department Of Parks, Heritage, And Tourism - Capitol Zoning District Commission Appropriation For The 2024-2025 Fiscal Year.

Impact

The bill's passage would solidify funding essential for the operational capacity of the Capitol Zoning District Commission, which is responsible for the oversight of development and preservation initiatives within the designated zoning district. It includes provisions for regular salaries, temporary employment, and miscellaneous operational costs that are vital for the commission's activities. The financial allocations ensure that the commission can continue to function effectively, adhering to state laws and regulations governing its operation.

Summary

Senate Bill 39, introduced in the 94th General Assembly, seeks to appropriate funds for the Department of Parks, Heritage, and Tourism specifically for the Capitol Zoning District Commission for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025. The bill outlines the financial requirements for personal services and operating expenses, indicating the state's commitment to maintaining and supporting the operations within the Capitol Zoning District. This appropriation is critical to ensure that the necessary staff and resources are available to manage the zoning and planning activities associated with this area of public interest.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB39 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among legislators who recognize the importance of proper funding for managing state heritage and tourism initiatives. The unanimous voting outcome, with 92 yeas and no nays, reflects a bipartisan agreement on the necessity of this funding to maintain the operation of essential governmental programs associated with parks and heritage conservation efforts.

Contention

Despite the supportive sentiment, some concerns were raised regarding the reliance on state funds and the management of resources within the designated domains. Questions were posed about the transparency of fund allocations and whether the appropriations would effectively address the needs of the Capitol Zoning District without compromising broader strategic objectives for state parks and heritage initiatives.