Connecticut 2013 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06596

Introduced
3/6/13  
Refer
3/6/13  
Report Pass
3/21/13  
Report Pass
3/21/13  
Refer
4/1/13  
Refer
4/1/13  
Report Pass
4/8/13  
Report Pass
4/8/13  
Refer
4/16/13  
Report Pass
4/23/13  
Engrossed
5/9/13  
Report Pass
5/13/13  
Report Pass
5/13/13  
Chaptered
6/6/13  
Enrolled
6/10/13  

Caption

An Act Concerning Police Officers And Firefighters.

Impact

If enacted, this bill will significantly affect how municipalities handle retirement benefits for their police officers and firefighters. It aims to modernize and streamline the employee retirement participation process but may also create discrepancies between municipalities depending on their choices regarding exclusion of certain positions. This could lead to varied levels of retirement benefits for municipal employees, impacting job stability and potential recruitment within these critical services. The overall goal is to balance the need for robust public safety employment with the fiscal realities municipalities face.

Summary

House Bill No. 6596, titled 'An Act Concerning Police Officers and Firefighters,' addresses the inclusion of municipal employees in specific retirement systems. The bill seeks to amend the existing statutes concerning how service performed by employees of municipalities is recognized for participation in retirement benefits. By outlining exclusions for certain positions and defining the conditions under which municipalities can choose to participate in the system, the bill reflects a move towards clarifying and potentially restructuring municipal retirement entitlements for police officers and firefighters.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6596 appears to be generally supportive among legislative members concerned with public safety. Supporters advocate for clarity in the retirement benefits system to ensure that personnel in critical roles such as law enforcement and firefighting are adequately supported post-service. However, there are concerns about the financial implications that these changes may impose on municipalities, especially those with tight budgets. Some dissenting voices fear that the exclusions outlined in the bill could exacerbate inequities in retirement benefits among workers in different municipalities.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential financial burden on municipalities required to adapt to new retirement policies, as smaller municipalities may struggle to meet the highlighted requirements or opt out, leading to a fragmented system. Critics may also argue that the exclusions could limit the effectiveness of the retirement benefits intended to attract, retain, and honor service personnel. This debate highlights the need for a more inclusive approach to public safety employment policies while respecting the financial constraints of municipal administrations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00341

An Act Establishing A Fallen Officer Fund And Providing Health Insurance Coverage To Survivors Of A Police Officer Killed In The Line Of Duty.

CT SB00253

An Act Concerning Foreign Political Spending.

CT SB00001

An Act Concerning The Health And Safety Of Connecticut Residents.

CT HB05273

An Act Concerning The Recommendations Of The Intergovernmental Policy And Planning Division Within The Office Of Policy And Management, Audits And Municipal Finance.

CT SB00440

An Act Concerning Certificates Of Need.

CT SB00422

An Act Concerning Firefighter Recruitment And Retention.

CT SB00381

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Mandated Reporter Requirements.

CT SB00008

An Act Concerning Drug Affordability.

CT SB00331

An Act Concerning State Marshals' Health Benefits.

CT SB00180

An Act Concerning Adverse Determination And Utilization Reviews.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.