Louisiana House Bill HCR68

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/12
• Refer: 4/4/12

Caption

Provides with respect to state procurement contracts let via a request for proposal process

Impact

The amendment aims to encourage state departments and other public entities to prioritize small and veteran-owned businesses during the procurement process. By incentivizing subcontracting with these entities, HCR68 seeks to foster economic growth and opportunity for underrepresented businesses in Louisiana. The scoring system outlined in the proposal allows businesses that subcontract a significant portion of their work to such enterprises to gain additional points, thereby increasing their competitiveness in securing state contracts.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 68 (HCR68) proposes an amendment to the Louisiana Administrative Code concerning the procurement of contracts through a request for proposal (RFP) process. The primary focus of the bill is to enhance participation by small and veteran-owned businesses in state contracts by establishing a scoring system that allocates points based on the extent to which these businesses are engaged in subcontracting on awarded contracts. Specifically, 15% of the total score in the RFP process will be dependent on whether a business qualifies as a small enterprise or a veteran-owned enterprise, and on the percentage of subcontracted work done with these businesses in the preceding year.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HCR68 appears to be positive, particularly among advocates for small businesses and veterans. Proponents argue that the bill will level the playing field for small entrepreneurs and veterans in state procurement, allowing them fair opportunities to compete for contracts that may have previously been dominated by larger firms. However, some concerns might exist regarding the implementation of the scoring system and whether it will fully achieve the intended goals without additional oversight.

Contention

While the bill largely enjoys support, notable points of contention may arise around the details of the scoring mechanism and its practical implications on all bidders. Critics may question whether the emphasis on subcontracting could inadvertently limit the pool of businesses eligible for contracts or lead to challenges in ensuring compliance and monitoring. Additionally, there could be debates surrounding the efficacy of such measures in driving meaningful change in procurement practices and whether supplementary support for these businesses will accompany the scoring adjustments.