Louisiana House Bill HR39

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/10/12
• Passed: 4/11/12

Caption

Recognizes April 17, 2012, as Komen for the Cure Day at the legislature and commends Susan G. Komen for the Cure and its La. affiliates

Impact

The resolution's recognition of Komen for the Cure emphasizes the urgency of addressing breast cancer in Louisiana, particularly given that the state has the second highest rate of breast cancer mortality in the nation. This recognition aims to foster a more informed public and mobilize support for breast health initiatives. The resolution also advocates for the full funding of the Louisiana Breast and Cervical Health Program, which is crucial for providing screenings to uninsured and underinsured residents, enhancing access to early detection and treatment options.

Summary

House Resolution 39 (HR39), sponsored by Representative Kleckley, serves to commend Susan G. Komen for the Cure and its affiliates in Louisiana for their significant contributions to improving the quality of life through breast cancer education, screening, treatment, and research. The resolution seeks to recognize April 17, 2012, as 'Komen for the Cure Day' at the Louisiana legislature, highlighting the efforts of the organization in advocating for breast cancer awareness and care.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HR39 is positive, as it aligns with community sentiments advocating for better healthcare access and awareness of breast cancer issues. The resolution reflects a collective appreciation for the grassroots efforts of Komen for the Cure, creating a sense of community involvement in the battle against breast cancer. It highlights the need for proactive measures in a state facing severe health disparities regarding breast cancer outcomes.

Contention

While the resolution itself aims to foster goodwill and support for breast cancer initiatives, it indirectly underscores the disparities in healthcare access faced by many residents in Louisiana. The emphasis on funding for health programs may bring to light ongoing debates about healthcare adequacy, equity, and the necessity for state intervention in health-related disparities. However, any potential critique would stem from concerns about adequate implementation and support for the resolutions' objectives in addressing the urgent needs of vulnerable populations.