Louisiana Senate Bill SCR77

Louisiana 2012 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/30/12
• Passed: 4/30/12
• Engrossed: 4/30/12

Caption

Provides for a joint session of the legislature to recognize the bicentennial anniversary of Louisiana statehood and invites Lt. Governor Jay Dardenne to conduct the First-Day-of-Issue Ceremony celebrating the Louisiana Bicentennial during the joint session.

Impact

The resolution reflects an important cultural and historical acknowledgment, allowing the state legislature to engage actively in celebrating significant anniversaries that define Louisiana’s identity. The event's organization under SCR77 not only serves to foster a sense of pride among Louisianans but it also underscores the importance of civic engagement in state governance, as such commemorations bring attention to state history and heritage.

Summary

SCR77 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution that provides for a joint session of the Louisiana legislature to commemorate the bicentennial anniversary of Louisiana statehood. The resolution lays out plans for the legislative assembly to convene in the House Chamber on April 30, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., highlighting the significance of this historical milestone for the state. The event is designed to be a moment of recognition and celebration of Louisiana's history, bringing together members of the legislature for a united purpose of honoring their state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SCR77 is likely positive, particularly among those who value state pride and historical reflection. Given the nature of bicentennial celebrations, legislators and citizens may perceive the resolution favorably as an opportunity to honor their heritage. The act of inviting the Lieutenant Governor to conduct the First-Day-of-Issue Ceremony denotes an organized and respectful approach to recognizing such a significant event in Louisiana's history.

Contention

While the SCR77 appears to be uncontroversial in its nature, the discussions surrounding such resolutions can sometimes raise points of contention regarding the allocation of resources for commemorative events versus pressing legislative concerns. Nonetheless, any debates would likely stem from broader considerations about the role of state recognition and funding for historical celebrations, rather than direct opposition to the resolution itself.