Louisiana Senate Bill SB1

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13
• Report Pass: 4/17/13
• Engrossed: 4/22/13
• Refer: 4/23/13
• Refer: 5/14/13
• Refer: 5/15/13
• Report Pass: 5/28/13
• Refer: 5/29/13
• Report Pass: 5/30/13

Caption

Constitutional amendment to prohibit legislation relative to state tax rebates from being considered during a regular session held in an even-numbered year. (2/3-CA13s1(A))

Impact

The proposed amendment would modify Article III of the Louisiana Constitution, specifically affecting the legislative calendar and how state lawmakers address taxation and financial policymaking. By preventing the introduction of tax rebate legislation during even-numbered year sessions, the bill emphasizes a more measured approach to tax policy, potentially improving legislative focus and clarity for voters. This could lead to more informed decision-making in terms of state fiscal policies, as well as the role of ballot propositions concerning tax matters.

Summary

Senate Bill 1 (SB1) proposes a constitutional amendment to prohibit legislation regarding state tax rebates from being considered during regular sessions held in even-numbered years in Louisiana. This change aims to align the treatment of tax rebates with other tax-related matters and standardizes the legislative process by restricting discussions on such financial measures during specific annual sessions. The intention behind the bill is to manage the timing of tax legislation, ensuring that complex financial matters are not rushed through during the biennial session.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB1 is relatively neutral, with no significant opposition reported in the voting history, culminating in a unanimous rejection during Senate vote (#956). Proponents may view this as a necessary step to create a more organized legislative structure regarding tax issues. However, the lack of support also reflects a possible uncertainty about the implications this amendment might have on the funding of state programs and how it could affect the distribution of tax rebates potentially sought by constituents.

Contention

Although the bill did not face substantial opposition, possible points of contention could arise pertaining to the potential consequences this amendment may have on the legislative process thus impacting taxpayer benefits. Skeptics could argue that restricting the consideration of tax rebates might hinder timely responses to fiscal changes or needs within the community, thereby delaying crucial tax relief for residents during economic downturns or other crises. Moreover, opponents could raise concerns about the nature of future legislative sessions and whether they will be adequately responsive to evolving fiscal needs.