Connecticut House Bill HB05448

Connecticut 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/14
• Refer: 2/27/14
• Report Pass: 4/1/14
• Refer: 4/11/14
• Report Pass: 4/17/14
• Refer: 4/22/14
• Report Pass: 4/25/14
• Engrossed: 5/1/14
• Report Pass: 5/2/14

Caption

An Act Concerning The Discontinuance Of Highways And Private Ways By Municipalities.

Impact

The bill would have a significant impact on local governance by simplifying the process through which municipal officials can discontinue streets and roads that are no longer in use. This reduction in bureaucratic hurdles is intended to allow towns more flexibility in managing their land use and infrastructure. However, the bill also introduces requirements for notification, which aims to protect the interests of local property owners who may be affected by such decisions. Additionally, the bill establishes a pathway for appeal to the Superior Court for aggrieved parties, ensuring that there are checks in place regarding town decisions.

Summary

House Bill 05448 aims to amend the regulations concerning the discontinuance of highways and private ways by municipalities in Connecticut. The proposed legislation alters existing statutes, enabling selectmen to discontinue any highway or private way with majority approval from a town meeting. Key provisions require that property owners bordering the way receive written notice prior to any meeting concerning the discontinuance, thereby promoting transparency and public engagement in local governance decisions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05448 appeared to be largely positive, particularly among proponents who appreciate the streamlining of municipal decision-making processes. Supporters argue that the bill empowers local officials and enhances governmental efficiency, which can be beneficial for community development. Conversely, there are concerns among critics about the risks of mismanagement or hasty decisions that could arise from such powers being granted to local officials without sufficient oversight, particularly in areas where public usage may still be relevant.

Contention

Discussions around the bill highlighted a notable contention regarding local control versus state intervention in municipal affairs. While advocates promoted the bill as a necessary reform to outdated practices, some opposition voiced apprehensions about the potential for overreach by local governments in discontinuing highways without adequate community input. The requirement for property owner notification may serve as a compromise, but the balance between efficient governance and community rights remains a key point of debate.