Louisiana House Bill HB336

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/8/13
• Refer: 4/8/13

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "James Morvant v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, State of Louisiana through the DOTD, and Plaquemines Parish"

Impact

The passage of HB336 not only addresses the financial responsibility of the state but also underscores the state's commitment to honoring legal judgments. By appropriating these funds, the state aims to maintain legal compliance and uphold the rule of law. This financial appropriation is significant in illustrating how legal judgments can impact state budgets and the necessity for legislative bodies to respond to such obligations effectively.

Summary

House Bill 336, sponsored by Representative Garofalo, aims to appropriate funds necessary for the state of Louisiana to fulfill a consent judgment related to the legal case of 'James Morvant v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, State of Louisiana through the DOTD, and Plaquemines Parish.' The bill specifies that a sum of $15,000 from the state general fund for the fiscal year 2013-2014 will be allocated for this purpose. The funds are intended to settle the judgment stemming from the aforementioned suit, ensuring that the state's financial obligations from the legal ruling are met.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB336 appears relatively neutral, given its focus on fulfilling a legal obligation rather than introducing new policy or political debate. The necessity of the bill stems from the court's decision, which leaves little room for controversy. As the bill merely allocates funds for payment, the discussion among lawmakers likely revolves around budget management rather than heated partisan dispute.

Contention

While there is minimal contention directly reported around HB336, the bill does illuminate the ongoing discussions about state budgeting and fiscal responsibility in the face of legal rulings. It emphasizes the necessity for future legislative planning to account for potential legal settlements that could arise from similar cases. Such conversations could invoke broader discussions on how the state manages its commitment to justice while balancing its financial resources.