Arizona 2024 Regular Session

Arizona House Bill HB2046

Introduced
1/8/24  
Report Pass
1/17/24  
Introduced
1/8/24  
Report Pass
1/22/24  
Report Pass
1/17/24  
Engrossed
1/25/24  
Report Pass
1/22/24  

Caption

Juror information; master jury list

Impact

The bill mandates that the jury commissioner produce a master jury list that includes comprehensive details about eligible jurors, such as names, addresses, dates of birth, and, when available, contact information. This reform is expected to minimize duplications and improve the accuracy of juror records. Local governments will be required to cooperate with the state to ensure that their lists align with updated regulations, which may necessitate adjustments to local processes and record-keeping methods.

Summary

House Bill 2046 addresses the management of juror information by amending sections 21-101 and 21-301 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. The bill introduces clearer definitions and updated processes for generating and maintaining a master jury list, which is essential for ensuring that juror pools are representative and up-to-date. By consolidating the criteria for juror eligibility and management, the bill aims to streamline the jury selection process and enhance the integrity of jury service in Arizona.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB2046 is largely supportive, particularly among legal professionals and lawmakers who emphasize the importance of a reliable and efficient jury selection process. Advocates argue that the reforms proposed will lead to a more effective judicial system and ensure fairer trials. However, some concerns have been expressed regarding the implications of increased data collection and privacy issues related to juror contact information, prompting discussions about the boundaries of data use and ethical considerations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the necessity of updated provisions versus the potential for overreach in collecting personal information. Critics argue that while improving the jury system is essential, safeguarding citizens' privacy should also be a priority. The balance between maintaining an efficient jury management process and protecting individual privacy rights is likely to be a significant aspect of ongoing discussions surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MS HB1566

Deed; require refusal of deed when required telephone numbers are not included.

NJ A4906

Limits use of restrictions on telephone calls as discipline measure during incarceration.

CA SB991

Human trafficking victims: assistance: grants.

HI HCR66

Requesting The Establishment Of A Telehealth And Telephonic Services Working Group To Address The Complexities Surrounding The Appropriate Use Of Telehealth And Telephonic Services, By Specialty Care Area, And Coverage Of These Services By Health Insurance.

HI HR60

Requesting The Establishment Of A Telehealth And Telephonic Services Working Group To Address The Complexities Surrounding The Appropriate Use Of Telehealth And Telephonic Services, By Specialty Care Area, And Coverage Of These Services By Health Insurance.

CT SB01058

An Act Concerning Charitable Organizations, Telecommunications And The Attorney General's Recommendations Regarding Consumer Protection.

CA SB1444

Joint powers authorities: South Bay Regional Housing Trust.

CA AB2468

Bees: apiaries: registration: colony relocation: administrative civil penalty.