Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB582

Introduced
4/8/13  
Introduced
4/8/13  
Refer
4/8/13  
Refer
4/8/13  
Report Pass
4/11/13  
Report Pass
4/11/13  
Engrossed
4/17/13  
Engrossed
4/17/13  
Refer
4/18/13  
Refer
4/18/13  
Report Pass
5/15/13  
Report Pass
5/15/13  
Enrolled
5/28/13  
Enrolled
5/28/13  
Chaptered
6/7/13  
Chaptered
6/7/13  
Passed
6/7/13  

Caption

Provides relative to parking spaces for certain disabled persons

Impact

The enactment of HB 582 will update and strengthen Louisiana’s parking regulations concerning disabled access. Specifically, it introduces the requirement for distinctive signage in access aisles, which aims to prevent misuse of these vital spaces. Additionally, the bill stipulates penalties for violations, thereby aiming to deter non-compliance and enforce proper usage of reserved spaces. This change will have broad implications for parking lot designs and compliance measures across the state, particularly for newly constructed or renovated facilities.

Summary

House Bill 582 aims to enhance accessibility for disabled persons by mandating specific signage and regulations for parking spaces reserved for mobility-impaired individuals. The bill requires that access aisles adjacent to these parking spaces have the phrase 'NO PARKING' clearly marked on the pavement. This move is intended to ensure that these spaces are adequately accessible and that violations are easily identifiable. By standardizing how access aisles are marked, the bill aligns state law with the broader intent of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to promote accessibility.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 582 appears largely positive, with advocates praising the legislation as a necessary step towards improving the quality of life for individuals with mobility impairments. Supporters argue that clear signage will enhance the usability of designated spaces for disabled individuals, thereby fostering inclusivity. While opposition was not prominently noted in the materials reviewed, potential concerns could arise regarding the implementation of penalties and whether they are adequate to enforce compliance effectively.

Contention

Notably, there could be points of contention regarding the enforcement and scope of the bill. Questions may arise about the adequacy of penalties for violations and the challenges faced by local governments in implementing the new regulations. Additionally, some stakeholders may consider the cost implications for property owners required to modify or repaint existing parking spaces to comply with the new requirements, potentially leading to discussions on balancing accessibility improvements with financial considerations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.