Louisiana House Bill HB676

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/15/13
• Refer: 4/16/13

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment in the matter of "Erica Lynn Crochet v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development"

Impact

The impact of HB 676 is primarily financial, as it directly affects the state's budget by allocating funds to settle a court judgment. By specifically designating these funds for payment, the legislation aims to uphold court rulings and maintain the integrity of the state's legal and fiscal responsibilities. Although the amount seems modest, it reflects ongoing legal liabilities the state faces, particularly concerning issues related to transportation and public safety.

Summary

House Bill 676 is a legislative measure that appropriates $27,500 from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana for the fiscal year 2013-2014. The allocated funds are specifically designated for the payment of a consent judgment in the legal case 'Erica Lynn Crochet v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development.' This bill provides necessary funding to fulfill the state’s financial obligation resulting from a court decision, thereby ensuring compliance with legal judgments and the proper administration of justice within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 676 appears to be neutral to positive, given its nature as a necessary appropriation to settle a legal matter. There might not be significant contention or opposition, as the bill does not introduce new laws or regulations, but rather fulfills an existing obligation. However, discussions may have touched on the broader implications of state financial management and legal expenditures.

Contention

While HB 676 does not appear to carry substantial points of contention on its own, it highlights ongoing issues related to the state's fiscal responsibilities in legal matters. The necessity of appropriating funds for judgments indicates that the state might encounter similar situations in the future, raising questions about the management of state funds and the importance of legal settlements. Legislators may have debated the appropriateness of the amount or the implications of similar future obligations, but specific contentious points were not documented within the provided materials.