Louisiana House Bill HCR158

Louisiana 2013 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/23/13
• Engrossed: 5/29/13
• Report Pass: 6/1/13
• Passed: 6/6/13

Caption

Creates an Ad Hoc Interim Joint Legislative Committee on Budgetary Procedure

Impact

The establishment of this committee could lead to significant changes in how Louisiana's state budget is developed and reviewed. As the committee engages in its study, it may find areas where current procedures hinder transparency, category clarity, or accountability in budgetary allocations. Recommendations from the committee are expected to enhance existing state budget processes and possibly introduce new practices that ensure a more precise understanding of expenditures across various categories such as personal services and operational expenses.

Summary

HCR158 is a House Concurrent Resolution that establishes the Ad Hoc Interim Joint Legislative Committee on Budgetary Procedure in Louisiana. The primary objective of this committee is to study the feasibility of modifying the format and procedures related to the development, implementation, and review of the state budget. The committee is tasked with making recommendations to the Joint Legislative Committee on the Budget with a deadline set for sixty days prior to the 2014 Regular Session of the Legislature. This initiative arises from the recognition of challenges in the current budgeting approach and aims to evaluate and potentially refine it for improved clarity and efficiency.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HCR158 appears to be largely favorable among legislators who see the need for a thorough reevaluation of budgetary procedures. Supporters argue that the current system is inefficient and lacks necessary detail, advocating that a fresh approach could lead to better fiscal governance in the state. However, as with many legislative initiatives, there may also be skepticism and calls for careful scrutiny to ensure that any proposed changes do not unintentionally complicate or undermine existing frameworks.

Contention

While generally well-received, some points of contention may arise regarding the composition of the committee and the scope of its authority. Concerns could be raised regarding potential biases based on who is appointed to the committee, as these members could influence the outcomes of the review process. Additionally, the timeline for recommendations and the commitment from legislators to act on these recommendations will be crucial in determining the actual impact of this resolution on state budgeting practices.