Louisiana House Bill HB296

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14
• Report Pass: 4/2/14
• Engrossed: 4/14/14
• Refer: 4/15/14
• Report Pass: 5/14/14
• Enrolled: 5/22/14
• Chaptered: 6/12/14
• Passed: 6/12/14

Caption

Provides for an automatic recount in elections when the number of absentee by mail and early voting ballots could make a difference in the outcome of the election (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

Impact

The impact of HB 296 on state laws involves an update to procedures mandated for recounts of absentee and early voting ballots. It specifies timelines and procedures for recounts, setting a standard that requires recounts to occur on the fifth day after the election, contingent on a formal request. Additionally, the bill stipulates that the requester will bear the initial costs of the recount, which fosters accountability while ensuring that resources are utilized judiciously during close elections. If the recount alters the election outcome, the costs are refunded, thus incentivizing legitimate recount requests when warranted.

Summary

House Bill 296 is designed to amend existing election laws in Louisiana regarding the recounting of absentee by mail and early voting ballots. The bill introduces provisions for automatic recounts in elections where the number of absentee ballots may influence the outcome, responding to requests from candidates or voters associated with propositions. The intent behind this legislation is to enhance the integrity of the electoral process by ensuring that every vote is accounted for, especially in close contests where absentee ballots or early voting could sway the results.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 296 appears to be supportive, particularly among those who value electoral transparency and integrity. The passage of the bill demonstrates a legislative willingness to adapt to the evolving needs of electoral processes, ensuring fair representation in light of absentee voting trends. Lawmakers recognized the significance of ensuring every vote counts, especially in a era where absentee voting practices are more prevalent. However, concerns were raised regarding the financial burden on individuals requesting recounts, which could be a potential barrier to access for some voters.

Contention

Notable points of contention from discussions surrounding HB 296 focused on the implications of the cost-related stipulations for recounts. While proponents argue that making candidates responsible for recount costs encourages serious and justified recount requests, critics are concerned that this may disenfranchise voters who may not be able to afford the upfront costs. Additionally, the timing and operational aspects of implementing such recounts may also be scrutinized to ensure they are executed in a manner that is both fair and efficient, upholding the standards of democratic engagement.