Louisiana House Bill HB828

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/14
• Refer: 3/10/14

Caption

Requires disclosure and labeling of food products derived from cloned animals

Impact

The enactment of HB 828 could significantly impact state agricultural and food industries by establishing new labeling standards and recordkeeping protocols. This law would enhance consumer awareness and choice regarding food products, thereby empowering individuals to make informed dietary decisions. The Department of Health and Hospitals has been given the authority to create rules to enforce this law, which might lead to increased oversight in food processing and distribution. However, it is crucial to note that the bill exempts food served in restaurants, which could limit its overall reach in ensuring that consumers are informed about cloned animal products.

Summary

House Bill 828 mandates the disclosure and labeling of food products derived from cloned animals and their progeny in Louisiana. The bill is aimed at informing consumers about the origins of their food, particularly if it involves products from cloned animals, which are defined as animals created from somatic cell nuclear transfer. The legislation requires that any food intended for human consumption containing such products must have a conspicuous statement on its packaging, ensuring visibility and clarity for consumers. Additionally, it provides recordkeeping requirements for sellers to maintain proof of origin for a period of two years, offering a layer of transparency in the food supply chain.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 828 tends to favor consumer protection and transparency. Proponents view this legislation as a necessary measure to uphold consumer rights and ensure that individuals are aware of the products they consume. There is a prevailing belief that consumers should have access to information regarding the genetic origins of their food. However, there may also be concerns from some agricultural producers about the potential economic implications of increased labeling requirements and the administrative burden it may impose on them.

Contention

Despite the general support for consumer transparency, notable points of contention could arise from the agricultural sector regarding compliance costs and practical implementation of labeling requirements. Some stakeholders may argue that the bill could adversely affect market dynamics, particularly if consumers associate cloned products with negative connotations. The challenge will be to strike a balance between improving consumer information and minimizing economic impacts on food producers while ensuring that the integrity of the industry is maintained.