Connecticut House Bill HB06959

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/5/15
• Refer: 3/5/15
• Report Pass: 3/19/15
• Refer: 3/27/15
• Report Pass: 4/2/15
• Engrossed: 5/12/15
• Report Pass: 5/14/15
• Chaptered: 6/10/15
• Enrolled: 6/15/15
• Passed: 6/24/15

Caption

An Act Establishing A Task Force To Develop A Pilot Earn And Learn Program.

Impact

The creation of the earn and learn program particularly impacts the structure of academic programs within state universities and colleges. By providing incentives for educational institutions to develop supportive frameworks for work-based learning, the bill seeks to create a more practical learning environment that benefits students financially and academically. The bill's implementation is intended to support students in covering their educational expenses while gaining valuable job experience directly related to their fields of study.

Summary

House Bill 6959 establishes a task force aimed at developing a pilot earn and learn program within Connecticut's higher education institutions. This initiative represents a significant step towards integrating practical work experience with academic learning, allowing students to earn money while studying. The task force is mandated to assess existing models of successful work-based learning programs in other states to inform its recommendations, ensuring that the program's financial and administrative structures are viable. This legislation is positioned to enhance educational outcomes by fostering partnerships between educational institutions and employers.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 6959 appears to be optimistic, particularly among educational leaders and employment advocates who see it as a progressive move towards enhancing student readiness for the workforce. Supporters argue that such initiatives can bridge the gap between education and employment, ultimately preparing students more thoroughly for their careers. However, there may also be concerns about the execution of the program, particularly regarding equitable access for all students and how work placements are allocated.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the task force's composition and its ability to fairly represent various stakeholders in the educational and business sectors. Critics may raise concerns about the diversity of perspectives within the task force, particularly whether there is adequate representation from different types of educational institutions and whether the interests of all students are addressed. Additionally, the mechanisms for funding the program and the adequacy of wages for student work placements could provoke debate regarding the program’s sustainability and effectiveness.