Louisiana House Bill HCR178

Louisiana 2014 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/19/14
• Refer: 5/20/14

Caption

Requests the Department of Health and Hospitals to study the desirability of a prospective state policy on the practice of medicine by late-career practitioners

Impact

This bill could have significant implications for the practice of medicine and healthcare delivery in Louisiana. By initiating a study on the establishment of a policy that could include a mandatory retirement age and periodic recertification requirements, it addresses concerns pertaining to both patient safety and the well-being of physicians who are reaching advanced ages. Such measures may ensure that healthcare providers maintain the necessary skill level to safely treat patients.

Summary

HCR178 is a House Concurrent Resolution that urges the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals to study the desirability of establishing a state policy regarding the practice of medicine by late-career practitioners. The resolution highlights the increasing number of physicians over the age of sixty-five, a trend anticipated to rise, and acknowledges the potential impact of the economic climate on older physicians' decisions to retire.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HCR178 appears to be cautious. Supporters recognize the need for a structured assessment of late-career practitioners' fitness to practice, citing studies that raise concerns about patient outcomes associated with older surgeons. However, the proposal for a policy that may limit the ability of seasoned doctors to practice could be contentious, as there are varying perspectives on the abilities of aging practitioners.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns regarding the autonomy and professional rights of late-career practitioners. While the proposed evaluations aim to enhance patient safety, some may argue that implementing mandatory retirement ages or rigorous recertifications could undermine the valuable experience that older physicians bring. The outcome of this study may lead to competing interests between ensuring high standards of care and respecting the established careers of physicians.