(Constitutional Amendment) Removes ability for the legislature to opt out of a veto session (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Impact
If enacted, this amendment would clarify and potentially strengthen the legislative check on the governor's veto power by mandating that all vetoed bills are reconsidered, regardless of legislative sentiment. Advocates of the bill argue that this change will enhance legislative oversight and accountability, as it would prevent the possibility of bypassing a veto session through a simple majority vote. This could lead to an increase in bills being reconsidered after a veto, thereby providing more thorough legislative scrutiny of the governor's decisions.
Summary
House Bill 31 proposes a significant amendment to the Louisiana Constitution by removing the provision that allows a majority of the members of either house of the legislature to declare a veto session unnecessary. Currently, if the governor vetoes a bill, the legislature is required to meet in a veto session to consider those vetoed bills. This bill seeks to ensure that a veto session is held unless there is an overwhelming consensus against it, thereby reinstating a more structured legislative process regarding gubernatorial vetoes.
Sentiment
The sentiment around HB 31 appears to be mixed among legislators. Supporters believe that requiring a veto session is a necessary step to uphold the legislative process and ensure that elected representatives have the opportunity to reconsider important legislation. Conversely, some opponents view the bill as an unnecessary constraint on legislative flexibility, arguing that it could lead to inefficiencies and potential politicization of the veto process.
Contention
Notable points of contention include concerns that the amendment could result in a heavier legislative workload, especially in years with numerous vetoed bills. Additionally, the bill raises questions about the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches, with critics cautioning that it could facilitate a deadlock in government operations if the legislature feels compelled to engage in extensive veto discussions without necessary justification.
(Constitutional Amendment) Provides that the timing and duration of regular sessions of the legislature may be set by joint rule of the legislature (OR +$1,288,800 GF EX See Note)
Proposing An Amendment To Article Xvii, Section 3 Of The Hawaii Constitution To Specify That The Standard For Voter Approval Of A Constitutional Amendment Proposed By The Legislature Is A Majority Of All The Votes Tallied Upon The Question.
(Constitutional Amendment) Requires legislative approval of a proposed constitutional amendment in two sessions before being submitted to the electors for ratification