Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HJ00133

Introduced
3/4/16  
Refer
3/4/16  
Report Pass
3/30/16  
Refer
4/8/16  
Report Pass
4/14/16  

Caption

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Sandro Solla And Remanding The Claim To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

Impact

If enacted, HJ00133 would have implications on the handling of claims against the state by reinforcing the right to a formal hearing for claims that have been initially dismissed. This could set a precedent for similar future claims against the state, ensuring that claimants have their cases evaluated based on their merits rather than procedural dismissals. The resolution demonstrates a commitment to addressing grievances effectively within the claims process, potentially impacting how such claims are processed statewide.

Summary

House Joint Resolution No. 133 (HJ00133) is a legislative resolution aiming to vacate the decision of the Claims Commissioner, which ordered the dismissal of a claim made by Sandro Solla against the state. The resolution directs the Claims Commissioner to reconsider the claim, emphasizing the need for a hearing on its merits. At its core, the resolution seeks to ensure that Solla's claim, which exceeds twenty thousand dollars, receives appropriate judicial consideration rather than being dismissed without due examination.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJ00133 appears to be supportive, particularly among those who advocate for fair treatment of individuals seeking restitution from the state. By remanding the claim for a hearing, the legislative body underscores its intention to provide a platform for thorough review and resolution, reflecting a commitment to justice and accountability in state dealings.

Contention

Despite the general support for the resolution's intent, there may be debates regarding the implications of allowing claims previously dismissed to proceed to hearings. Some may argue about the potential administrative burden this could create or question the validity of claims that have been dismissed based on existing criteria. These concerns highlight a tension between ensuring fair procedures for claimants and maintaining an efficient claims process for the state.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SJ00181

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Christopher Platt And Remanding The Matter To The Claims Commissioner For A Hearing On The Merits.

CT SJ00174

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Haydee Silva And Remanding The Matter To The Office Of The Claims Commissioner For A De Novo Hearing On The Merits.

CT HJ00176

Resolution Confirming The Decisions Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss Certain Claims Against The State.

CT SJ00173

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Mark Stuart And Remanding The Matter To The Claims Commissioner For Further Proceedings.

CT HJ00203

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner And Directing Said Commissioner To Order Immediate Payment To The Claimant Joe Baltas.

CT HJ00175

Resolution Vacating The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Deny The Claim Against The State Of Jesse Crystal.

CT SJ00184

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Angel Cortes.

CT HJ00194

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Daniel Topar.

CT SJ00155

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Arthur Aldrich.

CT SJ00171

Resolution Confirming The Decision Of The Claims Commissioner To Dismiss The Claim Against The State Of Anthony Walker.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.