Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB122

Introduced
3/19/15  
Refer
3/19/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/29/15  
Engrossed
5/6/15  
Engrossed
5/6/15  
Refer
5/7/15  

Caption

Provides relative to the election of judges for the City Court of Baton Rouge

Impact

The bill will have a considerable impact on the local electoral landscape, particularly for those seeking judgeships in Baton Rouge. By shifting the election process from designated sections to the entire city, the bill seeks to ensure that all residents have an opportunity to vote for judicial candidates, thereby enhancing democratic participation. Moreover, the proposed law will amend existing statutes in this regard, centralizing the election process for judges and possibly affecting judicial accountability and the representation of diverse community interests.

Summary

House Bill 122 aims to amend the provisions related to the election of judges for the City Court of Baton Rouge. Prior to the passage of this bill, judges were elected from two designated election sections within the city. The new legislation proposes that these elections will be held from the entire territorial area of Baton Rouge, effectively removing the existing election section structure. This change is significant as it broadens the potential voter base for judicial elections and may influence who can successfully run for these positions.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 122 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the change promotes equality in voting and representation, allowing more candidates from varied backgrounds to compete for judicial positions. On the other hand, critics may express concerns about how these changes could dilute local representation and the specific needs of different areas within the city. The discussions indicate a degree of apprehension regarding the balance of power in local governance following this legislative change.

Contention

A notable point of contention related to HB 122 revolves around the perception of fairness in elections. Some believe that removing the election section framework could lead to candidates focusing on larger, more populous areas, thereby ignoring less populated neighborhoods. This could potentially impact the diversity of voices and concerns represented in the City Court. Additionally, there may be concerns regarding how the amendments will affect voter turnout and engagement in different parts of the city.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.

MN HC1

A house concurrent resolution relating to the regent nomination joint committee.

AZ HB2443

Campaign finance; contributions limits