Connecticut Senate Bill SB00009

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/4/17
• Refer: 1/4/17
• Refer: 3/13/17

Caption

An Act Entering Connecticut Into The National Popular Vote Compact.

Impact

If enacted, SB00009 would effectively change how Connecticut's electoral votes are allocated during presidential elections. By committing to a national popular vote framework, the law aims to modify existing electoral practices that critics argue disproportionately favor less populous states. This agreement would only go into effect when enough states sign on to collectively hold a majority of electoral votes (at least 270). The adoption of this agreement reflects a broader movement towards reforming electoral processes to enhance electoral fairness and voter engagement.

Summary

SB00009 proposes to enter Connecticut into the National Popular Vote Compact, a legislative agreement designed to ensure that the electoral votes of participating states reflect the outcome of the national popular vote in presidential elections. This bill aims to align the state's selection of presidential electors with the candidate who receives the most aggregate votes across member states, rather than just the votes within Connecticut itself. Supporters believe this will better represent the democratic will of voters nationwide, circumventing the disparities caused by the winner-takes-all electoral-vote allocation method currently used by many states.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment towards SB00009 is mixed. Proponents see it as a vital step towards democratic reform and fairer representation at the national level, asserting that it aligns with the core democratic principle that every vote should count equally. However, critics express concern about the implications of diminishing the state-level focus of elections, claiming it could marginalize local issues and the representation of state-specific interests. This bill rekindles longstanding debates about the electoral college's relevance and the pursuit of greater electoral justice in the United States.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB00009 include debates about whether shifting to a national popular vote undermines the federalist structure that allows states to determine their own electoral processes. Opponents worry this might set a precedent that could destabilize state authority in electoral matters. Furthermore, the practicality of coordinating election results and the potential challenges posed by variations in state laws and practices add layers of complexity to the debate, placing proponents and critics at odds over both the philosophy and the execution of such changes to the electoral system.