Louisiana Senate Bill SB139

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

Constitutional amendment to exempt from ad valorem property taxes inventory held by manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, to be submitted to electors of the state if a certain law is enacted. (2/3-CA13s1(A))(1/1/16)

Impact

The enactment of SB 139 would broaden the scope of property tax exemptions currently in place for certain inventories. This shift signifies a strategic move that might not only stimulate growth within the manufacturing and retail industries but also spur job creation and investment within the state. By alleviating taxes on inventory, the bill aims to enhance cash flow for businesses, potentially translating into lower prices for consumers and a more favorable business climate overall.

Summary

Senate Bill 139 proposes a constitutional amendment that aims to exempt from ad valorem property taxes the inventory held by manufacturers, distributors, and retailers. This bill is positioned as a means to foster local economic development by reducing the tax burden on businesses, which advocates believe is crucial for enhancing competitiveness. If enacted, the amendment would alter existing tax exemptions related to inventory, specifically targeting those held by key stakeholders in the manufacturing and retail sectors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 139 appears to be favorable among business advocacy groups and free-market proponents who see this measure as a necessary step in promoting economic progress. Conversely, there are concerns from opponents who worry about the implications of tax exemptions on state revenue and public services funding. This ongoing debate reflects a common struggle between incentivizing business growth and ensuring adequate public funding through taxation.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 139 center on the balance between tax incentives for businesses and the potential impact on local government revenues. Critics argue that while the intention is to enhance economic growth, the long-term effects could lead to reduced resources for community services, such as education and infrastructure. This presents a critical discussion on the effectiveness and sustainability of tax incentives as a tool for economic development and the implications for overall state budgeting.