Authorizes construction management at risk pilot program. (8/1/15) (EN SEE FISC NOTE SD EX See Note)
If enacted, SB162 would amend R.S. 38:2225.2.4 to codify the CMAR method into Louisiana law, thereby providing public entities with greater flexibility in selecting contractors for construction projects. This pilot program may lead to enhanced project delivery timelines and improved cost management by involving contractors early in the planning process. The aim is to streamline procedures associated with public contracts while ensuring governmental entities can execute construction initiatives more effectively.
Senate Bill 162 introduces a pilot program for construction management at risk (CMAR) within Louisiana. The primary aim of the bill is to modify existing statutes to allow public entities to utilize CMAR for specific projects, deviating from the previous cost threshold of $25 million. This program is limited to a maximum of ten projects, each estimated at three million dollars or more. By permitting CMAR, the bill facilitates a more collaborative approach between contractors and public entities, allowing for input during the design phase for efficiency and cost-effectiveness in construction projects.
The general sentiment surrounding SB162 appears to be supportive, particularly among stakeholders in the construction and public works sectors. Proponents of the bill, which include legislators and construction industry representatives, argue that the CMAR approach allows for increased collaboration and reduced costs. However, there may be concerns from other quarters about the efficacy of the pilot program and whether the outcomes will justify the changes in existing procedures.
While SB162 has garnered wide support, discussions may arise regarding its implementation and governance. Critics might question the limitations imposed by the pilot program, such as the maximum number of projects and the initial cost threshold. Additionally, there could be skepticism about how effectively the program can be evaluated and scaled in the future, particularly regarding the balance of risk management and contractor accountability.