Louisiana Senate Bill SB157

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/2/15
• Refer: 4/13/15
• Report Pass: 5/11/15
• Refer: 5/12/15
• Report Pass: 5/18/15
• Engrossed: 5/20/15
• Refer: 5/21/15
• Report Pass: 6/1/15
• Enrolled: 6/9/15
• Chaptered: 6/29/15
• Passed: 6/29/15

Caption

Provides for the increase of certain fees for the courts of appeal. (7/1/15) (EN INCREASE SG RV See Note)

Impact

The bill's passage could have significant implications on the judicial process in Louisiana. By increasing filing fees, the bill may deter some individuals from pursuing appeals due to heightened financial burdens. This could lead to a reduction in the number of appeals filed, which may be concerning to those advocating for access to justice. Conversely, proponents argue that the increased fees are justified as they will help sustain the judiciary's operations amid budget constraints. Thus, the law aims to balance the financial realities of maintaining a functioning legal system with the public's right to access judicial services.

Summary

Senate Bill 157 aims to increase certain fees charged by Louisiana's courts of appeal. Specifically, the bill stipulates a revision of fees associated with the filing of records of appeal and applications for supervisory jurisdiction, with the intent to adjust the financial obligations that applicants must meet. The proposed changes reflect a legislative effort to generate additional revenue for the court system, which could support its operational costs and enhance services rendered to the public.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB 157 is mixed. Supporters, primarily within legislative circles, may view the fee increases as a necessary step towards ensuring the sustainability of the court system. However, there are concerns from various advocacy groups and members of the public who believe that higher costs will disproportionately affect low-income individuals seeking justice, potentially creating barriers to appealing decisions. This sentiment reflects a broader discussion surrounding access to legal resources and the implications of increased operational costs within the judiciary.

Contention

Key points of contention include debates over the fairness and necessity of increasing fees during a time when many individuals are already facing economic hardships. Opponents of the bill may push back against the notion that higher fees will enhance the efficiency or resources of the court, arguing instead that it undermines public access to the judicial system. The challenge will be to weigh the need for increased funding against the risk of limiting individuals' ability to seek appeals, which may lead to disparities in how justice is accessed across different socio-economic groups.