Creates the Woodlawn Estates Crime Prevention and Improvement District in East Baton Rouge Parish (EN +$116,616 LF RV See Note)
The legislation allows for the collection of a parcel fee not exceeding $200 per year on improved and unimproved parcels within the district, aimed at funding additional security measures such as patrols and improved illumination. This fee structure is designed to be approved by local voters and provides for accountability through annual budgeting and auditing by the legislative auditor. By facilitating these enhancements, the bill aims to create a safer environment for residents and to bolster community engagement by placing governance power in the hands of locally appointed officials.
House Bill 526, known as the Woodlawn Estates Crime Prevention and Improvement District Act, establishes a specialized district in East Baton Rouge Parish aimed at enhancing local safety and quality of life through crime prevention initiatives. The bill was introduced by Representative Ourso and seeks to empower the newly created district to implement various programs aimed at improving security and beautification efforts in the area. It specifies the district's boundaries, the purpose of governance, and funding mechanisms, which include the ability to impose a parcel fee with voter approval.
The sentiment surrounding HB 526 appears to be largely supportive among community members who see it as a proactive step towards addressing crime and improving their neighborhood. Residents view the ability to levy fees for additional security services as a positive development, fostering a sense of ownership and responsibility. However, some critics may express concerns regarding the potential for financial strain on property owners, especially if fees increase or extend over time without sufficient accountability or tangible results.
A notable point of contention revolves around the governance structure of the district, which is managed by a board composed of residents and representatives appointed by the local homeowners association, legislative representatives, and the parish assessor. Critics may argue that certain appointments could lead to conflicts of interest or a lack of representation for all residents, urging for more inclusive mechanisms to ensure community feedback and participation. Additionally, the implementation of fees raises questions about equitable treatment of property owners within the district.