Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00023

Introduced
1/9/17  
Introduced
1/9/17  
Refer
1/9/17  
Refer
1/9/17  

Caption

An Act Requiring Setting-neutral Reimbursement Policies In Contracts Between Health Carriers And Health Care Providers.

Impact

If enacted, SB00023 would amend the Connecticut General Statutes, specifically section 38a-472i. It would require insurance contracts entered into or amended after October 1, 2017, to reflect these setting-neutral policies. The potential impact on state laws includes adjustments in how health insurers negotiate and formulate contracts with healthcare providers, ultimately affecting reimbursement processes that previously varied based on service settings.

Summary

SB00023, titled 'An Act Requiring Setting-neutral Reimbursement Policies In Contracts Between Health Carriers And Health Care Providers', introduces a mandate for health insurers and related entities to adopt setting-neutral reimbursement policies. This means that payments made to healthcare providers for services must not vary based on the location where those services are delivered. The bill aims to simplify the reimbursement process across different healthcare settings, promoting consistency and equity among service providers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00023 appears to be supportive from various stakeholders in the healthcare system, as it addresses long-standing issues related to reimbursement disparities. Proponents argue that the bill facilitates fair compensation for healthcare providers, regardless of where services are performed. However, a concern exists among some providers who may feel that fixed reimbursement rates could limit financial flexibility depending on service complexities.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the concerns of healthcare providers, particularly specialists, who argue that the bill may not adequately account for the variation in costs associated with different settings of care. Critics fear that a rigid reimbursement model could undermine the nuanced requirements of certain services, particularly those that inherently have varying levels of care and complexity. The debate remains focused on balancing fair compensation with the need for efficient healthcare delivery.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.

CA AB848

Public contracts: University of California: California State University: domestic workers.

CA AB2557

Local agencies: contracts for special services and temporary help: performance reports.

MI SB0281

Insurance: health insurers; granting third party access to a dental network contract; allow. Amends 1956 PA 218 (MCL 500.100 - 500.8302) by adding sec. 3406aa.