Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB628

Introduced
4/3/15  
Introduced
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  

Caption

Requires that certain deductible items be added-back on certain corporate income tax returns (EG INCREASE GF RV See Note)

Impact

The implications of HB 628 are significant for corporate financial practices in Louisiana. By mandating that certain deductions related to transactions among related members be added back when computing taxable income, the bill aims to reduce the instances of tax avoidance. This is expected to lead to an increase in tax revenue for the state, as corporations may find themselves paying more taxes than before when utilizing these deductions. The regulation potentially sets a precedent for how related corporate transactions are treated across different jurisdictions, emphasizing transparency and accountability in corporate taxation.

Summary

House Bill 628 aims to amend Louisiana's corporate taxation framework by requiring corporations to add back certain otherwise deductible items, specifically interest expenses and costs associated with transactions with related members. This adjustment is crucial for calculating a corporation's net income taxable in Louisiana. The bill seeks to address potential tax avoidance strategies that corporations might employ, ensuring that income taxes are assessed accurately and fairly. The intent is to limit deductions that could result in reduced taxable income when transactions occur between corporations with shared interests or owners.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HB 628 has been mixed among stakeholders. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary step towards fair taxation practices and that it will help close loopholes that allow for tax evasion. Critics, however, express concerns that the bill may inadvertently burden businesses, particularly those that rely on inter-company financing for operations. There are apprehensions regarding compliance complexities and the overall impact on economic activity, especially for small to medium-sized enterprises that may not have the resources to navigate the new provisions effectively.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolved around the bill’s impact on related transactions. Opponents voiced that the bill might stifle legitimate business practices where related companies engage in transactions necessary for their operational efficiencies. Supporters countered that such provisions are essential for maintaining a level playing field in the corporate tax landscape. The bill is designed to allow exceptions where corporations can demonstrate that transactions do not primarily serve to avoid Louisiana taxes, but this safeguard has also been a topic of debate as it requires adequate documentation and agreement with state authorities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3182

Housing:governing documents: rental or leasing of separate interests: accessory dwelling units.

CA SB444

Property insurance: insurable interest.

CA AB319

Mobilehome Parks Act: inspectors: conflict of interest: enforcement actions: sunset.

CA AB534

Common interest developments: mechanics liens.

TX HB2261

Relating to the transfer or termination of certain timeshare interests.

TX SB738

Relating to the transfer or termination of certain timeshare interests.

CA SB401

Political Reform Act of 1974: state employees: financial interests.

CA SB407

Common interest developments: noncommercial solicitation.