Louisiana House Bill HB676

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/3/15
• Refer: 4/13/15

Caption

Reduces the amount of dealer's compensation for collection and remittance of state sales and use taxes (OR +$2,500,000 GF RV See Note)

Impact

The enactment of HB 676 is expected to have a notable impact on state laws regarding sales tax collection. By reducing the compensation for dealers, the state aims to retain a larger portion of the tax revenue generated through sales and use taxes. This could help alleviate budgetary pressures and support state-funded programs, as the current compensation level is viewed as potentially excessive given the state's fiscal constraints. By compressing the dealer compensation structure, the bill is designed to streamline tax remittance procedures and reduce associated administrative costs.

Summary

House Bill 676, introduced by Representative Kleckley, seeks to amend the existing laws governing the compensation of dealers for the collection and remittance of state sales and use taxes in Louisiana. The bill specifically reduces the allowable dealer's compensation rate from its current level to 0.935% of the tax amount collected. Additionally, it imposes a cap on the aggregate compensation that any dealer can receive, setting the upper limit at $100,000 per year. This adjustment is meant to address concerns about the state’s finances and ensure a more efficient tax collection process.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 676 appears to be mixed. Supporters argue that the bill is a necessary measure for fiscal responsibility and aligns with broader efforts to enhance the efficiency of the taxation system in Louisiana. They believe that the reduced compensation will not substantially burden dealers while allowing the state to retain more revenue. Conversely, opponents may express concerns that limiting dealer compensation could disincentivize timely tax remittance or lead to operational difficulties for smaller dealers who might struggle to absorb the reduced compensation.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 676 include the balance between adequate dealer compensation and state revenue needs. Critics might argue that the reduction could disproportionately affect smaller businesses that rely more heavily on this income stream. The discussions may also involve broader themes of how to effectively manage state revenue without overburdening small business operators, thereby highlighting the nuanced debate about tax regulation and economic health in the state.