Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

Louisiana House Bill HB718

Introduced
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/3/15  
Refer
4/13/15  
Report Pass
5/12/15  
Report Pass
5/12/15  
Engrossed
5/21/15  
Engrossed
5/21/15  
Refer
5/25/15  
Refer
5/25/15  
Report Pass
6/1/15  
Report Pass
6/1/15  
Enrolled
6/7/15  
Enrolled
6/7/15  
Chaptered
6/23/15  
Chaptered
6/23/15  
Passed
6/23/15  

Caption

Provides relative to the collection and sharing of certain student information (EN NO IMPACT GF EX See Note)

Impact

This bill significantly impacts state laws governing student information, emphasizing the need for parental consent when transferring data. The provisions ensure that schools remain accountable for the student data they manage and limit the circumstances under which this information can be shared or accessed. It establishes clearer guidelines, thereby affecting how schools approach data collection and sharing, which is crucial for maintaining student privacy in the digital age.

Summary

House Bill 718 focuses on the transfer of personally identifiable student information between public schools and external entities. The legislation mandates that local education agencies publicize information regarding the transfer of student data on their websites, aiming to increase transparency and awareness among parents and guardians. Additionally, the bill outlines the parameters within which student data can be shared, specifically restricting predictive modeling and requiring contracts that govern such data exchanges to have strict confidentiality clauses.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HB 718 appears to be supportive among lawmakers advocating for student privacy rights. Many view it as a necessary step towards enhancing the protection of student's personal information amidst growing concerns about data security and misuse. However, some opposition likely arises from organizations or stakeholders against overly stringent data privacy laws, fearing that it may hinder educational operations or collaborations with external educational service providers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between maximizing educational opportunities through shared data while also protecting individual privacy rights. Critics may argue that stringent limitations could restrict the capabilities of education service providers, which are essential for enhancing student learning experiences. As such, discussions around this bill encapsulated broader themes of data privacy versus educational innovation, showcasing the complexities in legislating these intersecting domains.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.