Connecticut Senate Bill SB00077

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/17
• Refer: 1/12/17

Caption

An Act Requiring Photographs On Removable Windshield Placards.

Impact

If enacted, SB 77 would directly affect subsection (a) of section 14-253a of the general statutes. The inclusion of photographs on removable placards is designed not only to bolster the integrity of the system but also to simplify the enforcement of regulations concerning parking privileges and access for disabled individuals. This change reflects a growing trend towards incorporating more stringent requirements for disability-related accommodations to ensure that they serve the intended purpose effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 77, introduced by Senator Kissel, aims to amend the existing statutes regarding removable windshield placards used by individuals who are blind or have disabilities. The bill's primary objective is to mandate the inclusion of a photograph of the individual for whom the placard is issued. This requirement is intended to enhance the identification process linked to these placards, potentially reducing instances of misuse or fraudulent use of placards granted to those with legitimate disabilities.

Conclusion

Overall, SB 77 seeks to create a more accountable framework for the issuance and enforcement of removable windshield placards for the disabled. By focusing on the identification integrity, the bill highlights the importance of ensuring that accessibility resources are not misappropriated while balancing the need for privacy and ease of compliance among individuals who are adversely affected by disabilities.

Contention

Discussions surrounding SB 77 may reveal various viewpoints among stakeholders. Proponents of the bill are likely to argue that requiring photographs will deter individuals from abusing the system, thereby allowing more equitable access to designated parking for those who genuinely need it. On the other hand, opponents could raise concerns regarding privacy and the potential challenges this requirement might pose for individuals who have difficulty obtaining a recent photograph or those who may not have easy access to photography services. Moreover, it could be seen as an additional hurdle for disabled individuals in an already challenging environment.