Commends Anderson "Andy" W. Barham for being named one of the top ten 2014 pilots for Pilots for Patients.
By recognizing individuals like Barham, SCR36 highlights the importance of volunteerism within the community and promotes awareness of programs like 'Pilots for Patients.' The resolution serves to honor not only Barham's efforts but also the entire network of volunteer pilots who provide invaluable services that can alter the course of patients' lives. This acknowledgment can inspire others to consider similar acts of community service, fostering a culture of altruism and support within the state.
SCR36 is a Senate Concurrent Resolution commending Anderson 'Andy' W. Barham for being named one of the top ten pilots of 2014 for 'Pilots for Patients.' This organization, based in Monroe, Louisiana, is dedicated to arranging voluntary flights for patients who require medical care, allowing them to access essential treatment without financial burdens. The resolution recognizes Barham's extensive service, noting that he has flown over 170 missions since becoming a volunteer pilot in 2008. His contributions to this cause exemplify a profound commitment to healthcare accessibility in the community.
The sentiment surrounding SCR36 seems to be overwhelmingly positive. It reflects a consensus among legislators about the vital role that volunteers play in enhancing public health outcomes. By commending Barham, the Legislature not only celebrates individual achievements but also underscores the shared value placed on community-focused initiatives and the spirit of volunteerism. This resolution was passed unanimously, indicating broad bipartisan support and appreciation for the contributions made by such volunteers.
SCR36 does not appear to have significant points of contention, as it is a resolution of commendation rather than a piece of legislation that imposes new laws or regulations. However, the underlying themes of the resolution might lead to discussions about the funding and support of volunteer organizations like 'Pilots for Patients.' While several lawmakers may advocate for increased recognition and support for such programs, specific disagreements over how to fund them or how they might be integrated into broader healthcare policy could emerge.