Louisiana House Bill HCR170

Louisiana 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/21/15
• Refer: 5/26/15
• Report Pass: 6/2/15
• Engrossed: 6/8/15
• Passed: 6/10/15

Caption

Creates a study committee to evaluate and make recommendations concerning Louisiana's system of healthcare delivery

Impact

In terms of legislative impact, HCR170 proposes a thorough examination of Louisiana's healthcare services with particular attention to disparities in access based on income and demographics. The resolution underscores the state's responsibility to ensure that citizens receive adequate healthcare, promising to inform future legislative actions aimed at enhancing the system. By proposing structured assessments and requiring a formal response from the committee, it aims to hold the state accountable for improving healthcare standards.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution No. 170 seeks to establish a study committee aimed at evaluating the statewide system of healthcare delivery in Louisiana. This resolution is prompted by significant changes in healthcare policies over the past years, including the implementation of federal reforms and the expansion of managed care programs. The committee's objective is to analyze the current healthcare landscape, address concerns about access and quality, and provide legislative recommendations based on objective evaluations.

Sentiment

The sentiment toward HCR170 appears to be constructive as it endeavors to tackle some pressing issues within Louisiana's healthcare system. While there may be concerns regarding the pace and comprehensiveness of existing reforms, stakeholders generally view the establishment of an evaluation committee as a critical step towards ensuring equitable healthcare delivery. The resolution is likely to garner support from various health advocacy groups who are invested in better health outcomes for Louisiana residents.

Contention

Despite the positive reception, potential points of contention may arise regarding the committee's composition and the transparency of its findings. Some critics might argue for broader representation on the committee to include voices from various communities and healthcare sectors. There may also be skepticism concerning the execution and follow-up on the committee's recommendations, depending on the political landscape and priorities within the state legislature.