Louisiana House Bill HB36

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/16
• Refer: 1/26/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment of judgment against the DOTD in the matter of "Kayla Schexnayder and Emily Lagarde v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development"

Impact

The financial impact of HB 36 is significant as it ensures that the plaintiffs receive their awarded amounts, which may include funds for future medical expenses provided from the Future Medical Care Fund. Moreover, this bill underscores the responsibility of the state to adhere to judicial rulings and ensures that legal costs are effectively managed within the appropriations process. By providing these funds, the bill maintains compliance with established judgments against state agencies, thereby reaffirming the importance of judicial proceedings within state law.

Summary

House Bill 36 appropriates funds out of the state general fund for the fiscal year 2016-2017 to satisfy a judgment against the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) in the case of 'Kayla Schexnayder and Emily Lagarde v. State of Louisiana, Department of Transportation and Development'. The bill outlines the specific amounts to be allocated, which include $710,693.47 to Schexnayder and $357,311 to Lagarde, reflecting monetary awards for damages along with interest and costs associated with the case.

Sentiment

Generally, the sentiment around HB 36 appears to be supportive regarding the need for the state to honor its financial obligations as ruled by the court. By appropriating these funds promptly, lawmakers may be seen as acting diligently on behalf of constituents who seek justice and appropriate compensation. However, there might also be undercurrents of concern regarding the broader implications of state funds and how they are allocated in response to lawsuits against state departments.

Contention

A notable point of contention may arise from the funding mechanisms for these appropriations, particularly regarding how such judgments affect the state budget and future allocations. The necessity of ensuring that taxpayer money is used judiciously amid legal settlements can prompt debates on government accountability and fiscal responsibility. Furthermore, discussions might also touch upon the implications of similar future judgments and how these could shape policies around state liability.