Louisiana House Bill HB23

Louisiana 2016 1st Special Session

• Introduced: 2/14/16
• Refer: 2/14/16
• Report DNP: 2/23/16
• Engrossed: 3/6/16
• Report Pass: 3/7/16

Caption

Repeals three-year sunset of certain reductions to corporate income tax deductions, exemptions, and exclusions (Item #12) (RE1 SEE FISC NOTE GF RV See Note)

Impact

By extending these tax reductions, HB 23 aims to enhance the attractiveness of Louisiana as a business location, suggesting that continued lower tax burdens could lead to greater investment and economic activity. Supporters argue that this would maintain job growth and corporate presence in the state, which they believe are crucial for ongoing economic development. However, there is the implication that such fiscal policies could result in reduced state revenue during the extended period, which may affect funding for public services and infrastructure.

Summary

House Bill 23 proposes to extend the sunset period for certain reductions to corporate income tax deductions and exclusions previously set under Act No. 123 of the 2015 Regular Session. The current law provides for a three-year temporary reduction of 28% in these tax obligations, which is due to expire on June 30, 2018. This bill gestures towards a stabilization in corporate fiscal responsibilities by extending these provisions, thereby allowing corporations more time to benefit from these reduced rates and potentially impacting their overall tax liabilities favorably.

Sentiment

The sentiment around the bill appears to be mixed. Proponents, particularly from the business community and some legislators, view the extension as a vital mechanism to support and grow Louisiana's economy, whereas opponents are concerned about long-term implications for the state's fiscal health. They argue that continuous tax breaks for corporations could exacerbate existing inequalities in state funding allocation. Some legislators have expressed trepidation over sustaining revenue, suggesting that while the intent is to attract businesses, it should not come at the expense of public welfare and service adequacy.

Contention

Key points of contention center around the balance of supporting corporate interests while ensuring adequate public funding. Critics of HB 23 argue that extending corporate tax reductions means the state is prioritizing corporate welfare over community needs, potentially widening the fiscal gap between corporate and public financial responsibilities. Discussions have raised questions about the effectiveness of 'trickle-down' economic policies, highlighting a fundamental debate about where to draw the line on corporate tax reductions and at what cost to the public sector.