Louisiana House Bill HB104

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/15/16
• Refer: 2/15/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Provides, under specified circumstances, for repayment of a Taylor Opportunity Program for Students scholarship award (OR INCREASE GF RV See Note)

Impact

The implementation of HB 104 would potentially alter the existing structure of the TOPS program, emphasizing students' responsibilities beyond just receiving awards. The requirement to repay funds could discourage students from remaining enrolled if they find themselves falling behind academically or needing to change their educational paths. Furthermore, it can serve to tighten the eligibility criteria, thereby potentially affecting the number of students who qualify for financial assistance through this program.

Summary

House Bill 104 aims to amend the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS) by requiring students to repay scholarship amounts if they fail to maintain eligibility or complete their degrees or training within specified time limits. Under this proposal, if a student does not meet the academic requirements or fails to finish their program in the timeframe established, they will be liable for repaying the scholarship funds received on their behalf. This bill intends to enforce accountability and ensure that educational awards serve their purpose effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 104 appears to be mixed. Proponents may argue that it encourages students to stay on track and complete their education, thereby protecting state resources allocated for scholarships. Conversely, opponents may express concern that the repayment requirements might deter students from pursuing their education due to fear of debt or financial burden, especially for those facing personal challenges that hinder their academic progress.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the conditional repayment criteria, particularly how the rules will delineate exceptions for students who face permanent disabilities or military service. Critics may also raise issues regarding the fairness of holding students accountable for circumstances that could be beyond their control and the potential for increased financial hardship among graduates who struggle to find employment post-graduation.