Louisiana House Bill HB406

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/16
• Refer: 3/3/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Appropriates funds for payment in the matter of "Pamela Adams and Michael Adams v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development"

Impact

The impact of HB 406 is primarily financial, as it directs state funds towards settling legal obligations, which could have ripple effects on the available budget for other appropriations. By ensuring that the judgment is paid, this bill effectively reinforces the accountability of the state in legal matters, potentially preventing further legal complications or additional litigation costs that could arise from non-compliance with the court's decision.

Summary

House Bill 406 appropriates funds from the General Fund of the state of Louisiana to pay a consent judgment in the case of 'Pamela Adams and Michael Adams v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development'. The amount specified in the bill is $1,150,000, and the funding is allocated specifically for the fiscal year 2016-2017. This action is taken to fulfill the obligations of the state following a legal settlement, thus formalizing the payment process as required by law.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 406 is largely procedural, focusing on the necessity of adhering to judicial decisions and fulfilling financial obligations. There appears to be little opposition to the bill in its discussions, as it mainly follows through on a legal ruling, rather than introducing contentious new measures or changes to law.

Contention

While there is no strong contention regarding the passage of HB 406 itself, the underlying case reflects broader themes of state accountability and the financial implications of legal settlements. The funding allocated might raise questions among legislators about the state's financial priorities and whether adequate resources are being set aside for other essential services within the state.