Louisiana Senate Bill SB170

Louisiana 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/16
• Refer: 3/3/16
• Refer: 3/14/16

Caption

Provides relative to BESE authorization of Type 2 charters. (gov sig)

Impact

The implementation of SB 170 has significant implications on state laws relating to charter schools. By allowing local school boards to deny charter proposals based on a school's performance metrics, the bill maintains a level of oversight favoring established educational standards. It mandates that BESE now must undertake an academic and fiscal needs assessment and consider public testimony before approving charter proposals, thereby increasing transparency in the charter school approval process and ensuring that the needs of the local community are considered.

Summary

Senate Bill 170 aims to amend regulations governing charter schools in Louisiana, particularly in the context of the approval process by the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (BESE). The bill stipulates that BESE cannot enter into a proposed charter if it is located in a school system that has received a letter grade of 'A' or 'B' on its accountability evaluation, provided that the local school board previously denied or imposed conditions on the same or similar proposal. This addition is intended to enhance the scrutiny of charter proposals and ensure they are pursued in areas where traditional public schools are performing well.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 170 appears to be cautiously supportive among proponents of educational oversight, who argue that the bill reinforces accountability in the charter school sector. However, there are concerns among charter school advocates regarding the potential hindrance this bill imposes on the establishment of new schools in high-performing areas. Critics may argue this could frustrate efforts to expand educational options in regions where they are needed most, thus eliciting mixed reactions from stakeholders in the education community.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from the bill's limitations on BESE's ability to approve new charter schools in higher-performing districts. While supporters argue that these restrictions ensure a focus on quality and accountability, opponents view it as a barrier that may prevent innovative educational opportunities from reaching students in need. The requirement for an academic and fiscal needs assessment also adds an additional layer of procedural necessity that could prolong the establishment of charter schools.