Connecticut Senate Bill SR00010

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/17
• Refer: 1/18/17
• Report Pass: 1/25/17

Caption

Resolution Confirming The Nomination Of Sheila M. Hennessey Of Wethersfield To Be Reappointed A Member Of The Psychiatric Security Review Board.

Impact

The confirmation of Sheila M. Hennessey is expected to maintain continuity and stability within the Psychiatric Security Review Board, which plays a significant role in the oversight of mental health and security matters related to individuals who may pose a risk to themselves or society. The board’s operations directly support state laws concerning the treatment and rights of mentally ill offenders, contributing to a legal framework that balances safety with mental health considerations. This appointment aligns with ongoing efforts to ensure that individuals receiving psychiatric care within the justice system are handled with adequate professional oversight.

Summary

Senate Resolution No. 10, introduced in January 2017 by Senator Duff, seeks to confirm the reappointment of Sheila M. Hennessey as a member of the Psychiatric Security Review Board of Connecticut. This resolution signifies the state legislature's endorsement of the governor's choice for this position, which is crucial for evaluating and addressing the needs of individuals with mental health issues in the criminal justice system. The resolution is a standard legislative procedure that legitimizes the appointment of board members tasked with sensitive matters surrounding psychiatric evaluations and security reviews for offenders deemed not guilty by reason of insanity.

Contention

While the resolution passed unanimously, it is essential to recognize that discussions surrounding the nomination process often touch upon the qualifications and experiences of appointees. In this instance, the focus on Hennessey's legal background as a member of the Connecticut bar is indicative of the scrutiny involved in such appointments. Some members of the legislature may express concerns over ensuring that appointees possess the necessary expertise to make informed decisions regarding mental health security, particularly in cases that can impact public safety, thereby invoking broader conversations about mental health policy at the state level.